Los Angeles Times
…Although the decision arose in a drunken driving case, the requirement for live testimony from lab technicians extends to all manner of crime lab reports, including those involving drugs and DNA…
Daily Archives: June 24, 2011
A short two question survey from Forensic Connect. Tell us what you like, what you would like to see more of, less of…We would love to hear from our readers. Thank you!
Christian Science Monitor
The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that the practice of permitting substitutes to testify about forensic evidence violates defendants’ constitutional rights to confront their accusers.